Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Review: 2015 Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AWD

Photos by Ulysses Ang
The compact crossover genre was popularized by the Japanese. Given their propensity to favor small cars, putting height (but not necessarily four-wheel drive) seemed perfect for the urban environment. After all, going up mall ramps diagonally is uncool. Americans, who were mostly busy making rolling versions of the Stegosaurus, soon got into the game. One of the biggest hits is the Ford Escape. Locally, it brought the Blue Oval brand from niche to mainstream player almost overnight. Alas, it almost fell victim to fossilization after a model run lasting a good 12 years (2000-2012) despite three facelifts. (If you want to read the review on the Escape 1.6 SE EcoBoost, click here).

And then, like a meteorite from the heavens, boom: the all-new Ford Escape is here. It wiped out all traces of its ancient ancestor and felt like a blessing, a mana from the gods (who happened to look and sound like Alan Mulally) who said: “You’ve suffered long enough from carbon dated products. Now we give you the best we have. We give you EcoBoost. We give you Intelligent AWD. We give you SYNC with MyFord Touch powered by Microsoft™.”



With the exception of MyFord Touch (MFT), everything else is what Ford needed. It’s what the compact crossover segment needed. It’s what you needed, you just don’t know it yet. It brings curiosity. It brings excitement. It brings intrigue. Whoever said that this genre was cornered by the Japanese makes didn’t tell Ford.

The question now beckons: is the Ford Escape the best compact crossover out there.

It’s certainly come a long way, but it’s still not the super-uber best one out there. Still, you’ve got to hand it over to the Ford guys. A for effort—high five and slow clap. For starters, it looks nice. Nice like a spaceship landed on the roads, nice. There’s not a single weak point to the Escape’s sheet metal. It’s modern, sleek, and filled with all the correct angles and none of the curves. It’s as chiseled as Ben Affleck’s Batman chin. Even the 19-inch rims are nicely done. It’s garnered enough inquisitive looks from motorists, passersby, and gasoline station attendants. More importantly, it’s made one owner of the other “turbocharged compact crossover” salivate with envy. It’s like the Focus and the Explorer gave birth to a handsome crossover. This thing will give you a man crush, guaranteed.



But that admiration wears off and turns into confusion the moment you step inside the cabin. It’s like bubby cute Miley Cyrus suddenly turn all crazy and twerky on you. Without looking at the owner’s manual, just firing up the Escape requires a minute or two. After locating the oddly positioned Engine Start button, press it and you’ll be greeted by an avalanche of flashing screens, beeps, and chimes. It’s a sensory overload. And this experience doesn’t get any easier with time. Simply put, with the exception of the great seating position and the location of the major driving controls (steering wheel, shifter, and stalks), it’s an ergonomic nightmare.

The biggest culprit is the dual colored screens with one sandwiched between the speedo and tach, and the other, serving as MFT central. Both display a wealth of information, which is good, but navigating through them is confusing, which is bad. For instance, the small screen in the instrument cluster shows the multi-function display which is controlled by the left set of steering wheel buttons. That’s easy enough. So you’d think the story’s the same with MFT which is controlled by the joystick looking thingy? Nope. The joystick isn’t even a joystick; it simply operates the Tune and Seek functions. You want to access MFT? You have to use the touchscreen. And boy, is it laggy. The annoyance continues when you find that vehicle functions aren’t centralized either on the multi-function display or MFT. You want to change fuel consumption units? That’s in the multi-function display. Clock settings? MFT. Driver aids? Multi-function display. Rear camera? MFT. There’s no fast and easy rule. You simply have to go through all the menus and discover a nugget of new sub-menus. Well, at least you won’t get bored.



This crossover isn’t for the technologically challenged. But the ‘confuse and conquer’ attitude of the Escape doesn’t end there. There are other gripes, albeit less major. First, the CD slot is located on top of the center console, where the natural driver’s line of sight is. The MFT screen should have been put there. Second, controls for the customizable mood lighting aren’t located in the lighting panel. They’re on the panel controlling the sunroof (as a side note, the mood lighting does double as a door ajar warning, letting you know which door wasn’t closed properly; a nice touch). Third, see that high-gloss piano black accent running through the dash? It looks nice, but not when it’s blinding you half the time when sunshine hits it. Finally, it comes with a huge array of sensors like front and rear proximity sensors, but it only knows how to beep. There’re no visual representations where the beeps are coming from. It’s hard to understand how the Focus could have a visual indicator of where the obstacle is, while the Escape doesn’t. It’s so annoying, you’ll end up turning off the sensors before driving off, relying instead on the rear camera during parking.

For all its ergonomic pitfalls, the Escape is the segment’s most comfortable offering. Driving four to five hours straight is peanuts. It’s clearly built for interstate driving in the US. The four-spoke tiller is nice to hold, though the leather does have a weird fake texture. The front seats are highly supportive with adjustable lumbars and power adjustment for the front occupants (with memory for the driver) while the rear ones have reclining seat backs. Plus, there are eight air conditioning vents upfront and two at the back ensuring everyone gets his or her fair share of machine-chilled air. Space-wise, it’s much more cramped than its generous exterior dimensions suggest, akin to a Focus. So bringing your four friends along for the comfortable ride may not be a great idea, unless they’re really close or they’re Sports Illustrated swimsuit models. Items in the cargo hold fare much better than the passengers with a low and flat loading space. It’s tall enough to fit a common 18-liter (four gallon) water container upright with room to spare for the tonneau cover. The blacked out portion of the bumper’s a nice touch as well, preventing unwanted nicks and scratches when you have to slide heavy stuff out like luggage. And speaking about the cargo hold, you can’t talk about the Escape without discussing its most talked about feature: the hands-free tailgate. Anyone can do a power tailgate (the best execution so far, by the way), but the kick below the rear bumper to open? Magic.



Now comes the much-awaited part: the drive. With 240 horsepower and 366 Nm of torque, it easily stands toe-to-toe with another turbocharged compact crossover, the same one that caused salivation to its owner upon seeing the Escape. But despite the on-paper power specs, the on-road behavior is rather different. The direct-injected, turbocharged powerplant will largely disappoint Paul Walker wannabes because it gives the feel of a large displacement engine with its linear power delivery. It doesn’t give that “VTEC (or turbo) just kicked in ‘yo” moment nor does it dig you into the seatback. Instead, there’s locomotive-like progression. The aural quality is muted and muffled, with just a hint of a growl at the top end. Progress may not be felt by the seat of the pants, but it’s there. The speedometer doesn’t lie nor will any potential speed gun. What’s even lovelier is that it doesn’t rely on any fanciful switchable drive mode. It only has D and S. The lack of a selectable drive mode though means there’s no real way to curb its insatiable appetite for fuel: 5.55 km/L in the city, 15.38 km/L on the highway (good for a mixed figure of 7.14 km/L). That’s compared its rival which when left in ‘Intelligent’ mode still does 8.19 km/L in the city! Thankfully, the Escape balances that out by not being too picky with its fuel. It can run on regular 93-octane unleaded with no problems.

The six-speed automatic plays a supporting role in the Escape’s great on-road behavior. It shifts smoothly. In stop-and-go traffic, it goes largely unnoticed, giving the same shift shock-free feel of a CVT. It’s that good. It’s also flexible and anticipates your needs. It will adjust according to driving conditions instantaneously. During more spirited driving, it will hold the gear for you and will even allow you to bounce the limiter a tad before shifting up. It’s so good and responsive that you’ll forget that there’s a +/- rocker on the shift lever. And speaking about that rocker switch, that’s the least favorite thing about the entire driving experience, so good thing you don’t need to use that thing. Ever.



Outfitted with beefy 235/45 R19 Continental ContiProContacts, you’ll expect the Escape to have a firm and crashy ride. But, that’s far from the truth. In reality, suspension tuning is one its greatest strengths. It’s best experienced at mid to high speed where it quells road imperfections excellently. Concrete road ribs are absorbed very well and no crashiness makes it to the cabin. At low speeds, potholes and humps are much more noticeable, perhaps because of limited suspension travel, but again, they are mitigated before they reach the driver’s seat. It’s got a well-balanced ride that leans more toward the “comfort” side of the equation. And speaking of comfort, it’s serenely quiet with minimal road, tire, and wind noise. It’s too quiet in fact that those boy racers who refuse to grow up will feel somewhat disappointed (you know who you are).

It comes standard with an Intelligent AWD system that works transparently—you’ll only see it work via the multi-function display (if you happen to find it in the menus, that is). It shifts from front-wheel to all-wheel drive instantaneously without driver intervention. It quells wheel spin and torque steer excellently. The electric power steering offers an initially quick feel only to slow up as you rack up the turns. As a result, the Escape is best experienced in urban environments or at high speeds with gentle curves. In more aggressive driving, like the infamous “Tanayburgring”, it will exhibit noticeable body lean, tipping through corners. It has a great tendency to understeer as well.



At this point, it’s very clear that the Escape isn’t a WRC car on stilts. It doesn’t sound like a turbo. It doesn’t push you into the seat like a turbo. It doesn’t even ride like a turbo. It sure does sound like Ford’s pretty much muted the driving fun, and they did; but only if set your expectation as such. High-performance crossovers are supposed to deliver the driving goods; that’s expected. What makes the Escape different is that it does so without dispensing some of the more important attributes like comfort and NVH isolation. Perhaps it’s part of their One Ford Plan or extensive market research, but it’s clear that they want this crossover to be everything to everyone. And to a point, they’ve succeeded. It’s got enough tech and gizmos to keep you interested (or confused), enough grunt to emphasize ‘sport’ in ‘sport utility vehicle’, and enough design pizzazz to keep you, your spouse, and your nosy neighbor driving “the other turbocharged crossover” interested. That said, Ford did miss out on the Ken Block influence on this one, and it’s for that reason, maybe you would rather be the guy with “the other turbocharged crossover”.

2015 Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AWD
Ownership 2015 Ford Escape 2.0 EcoBoost Titanium AWD
Year Introduced 2014
Vehicle Classification Compact Crossover
The Basics
Body Type 5-door Crossover
Seating 5
Engine / Drive F/AWD
Under the Hood
Displacement (liters) 2.0
Aspiration Direct Injection, Turbocharged
Layout / # of Cylinders Inline-4
BHP @ rpm 240 @ 5,500
Nm @ rpm 366 @ 3,000
Fuel / Min. Octane Gasoline / 93~
Transmission 6 AT
Cruise Control Yes
Dimensions and Weights
Length (mm) 4,524
Width (mm) 1,838
Height (mm) 1,684
Wheelbase (mm) 2,689
Curb Weight (kg) 1,710
Suspension and Tires
Front Suspension Independent, MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension Independent, Multi-Link
Front Brakes Vented Disc
Rear Brakes Disc
Tires Continental ContiProContact 235/45 R19 H (f & r)
Wheels Alloy
Safety Features
Airbags 7
Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) Yes
Traction / Stability Control Yes
Parking Sensors Yes, Front and Rear (with Reverse Camera), Cross Traffic Alert
Exterior Features
Headlights HID
Fog Lamps Yes, Front
Auto Lights Yes
Auto Wipers Yes
Interior Features
Steering Wheel Adjustment Tilt/Telescopic
Steering Wheel Material Leather
Seating Adjustment Electronic (front, driver w/ memory)
Seating Surface Leather
Folding Rear Seat Yes, 60/40
On-Board Computer Yes
Convenience Features
Power Steering Yes
Power Door Locks Yes
Power Windows Yes
Power Mirrors Yes
Climate Control Yes, Dual
Audio System Stereo
CD
MP3
Aux
USB
No. of Speakers 10
Steering Wheel Controls Yes

26 comments:

  1. Which is better forester xt or escape?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm dying to find out myself. Especially since the Forester has just undergone a 2015 refresh which updates the prehistoric audio system.

      Delete
    2. I hope MI or some other subaru parts importer can offer radio upgrade to the new radio to old sj owners

      Delete
  2. "The lack of a selectable drive mode though means there’s no real way to curb its insatiable appetite for fuel: 5.55 km/L in the city, 15.38 km/L on the highway (good for a mixed figure of 7.14 km/L). That’s compared its rival which when left in ‘Intelligent’ mode still does 8.19 km/L in the city!"

    8.19 vs 5.55? just because of CVT? wow!

    You must make another review Uly. Ford Escape vs "the other turbocharged crossover" in a drag race.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know right? I swear... When I drove the Escape I honestly thought it had a 50-liter fuel tank the way it was gulping gas. It has a 60-liter tank.

      Delete
  3. best review so far. Uly, this or the 1.6Li?.. maybe the 1.6 doesnt exhibit the ergonomic flaws of the 2.0 sans the engine size and AWD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The ergonomic flaws stem mainly from that MyFord Touch. Looks nice, but nothing beats clearly marked physical buttons. Call me old-fashioned but that's the way I like it.

      I'm waiting for an Escape redesign that's similar to the revamped Focus. Looks like it will have a simpler, less frivolous layout and more physical buttons.

      That said, the 1.6 shares the same MFT system as the 2.0. So it's bound to have the same experience. Lovely seating position, not so lovely infotainment controls.

      Delete
  4. You are going to make Ford mad and James Deakin very angry, he was given the first Escape Ford brought in and he has used up all superlatives in glorifying this car, now you just shoot it down like that, wow Ulysses you got balls!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't shoot it down... Did I?

      I swear... I was being balanced here.

      Delete
    2. being too honest perhaps?

      Delete
  5. I find uly's comment a bit grown up this time. Lets face it, most automotive reviews in the phils. are candy coated and biased. hyping up superlatives and neglecting the real world scenario and experience of driving real time. In some other countries, they review cars short of murdering the model and brand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed.

      There's generally a wider selection of MPVs and SUVs being reviewed this year too.

      Delete
  6. Ford did not gave James Deakin the first ford scape (displayed in an auto show). He requested / short of begging Ford to sell him the Car. I believe jame's review of the new scape was borne out of the hype and excitement it made when it was first launch in the US. to be fair with Uly - this review is more in depth.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ford actually released Sync 3 and excpects it to be in all cars by 2017. Trust me, My Ford Touch is like hell. Sync 3 is the savior of Ford Customers

    ReplyDelete
  8. So...money still on the mazda cx5?

    ReplyDelete
  9. escape is turbo. CX5 is NA. not apple to apple. should be escape vs forester.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Good review! At least you're honest with your experience with the car. I somehow liked this all new Escape, but after reading your review especially on the "ergonomic nightmare" it seems confusing.

    1-10 overall rating for this car? 10 being the highest.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow!! it has two moles on top of the hood... instead of concealed nozzles like some modern design suv's.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yun lang... 5.55km/L, haha. So the best choice currently in this segment is still the CX-5, both variants are well-equipped and 100% CBU Japan. I don't need 240hp on a CUV, if I want to race I'll get the WRX not the Forester XT. BTW, Uly, why are you afraid to mention the Subaru in this review? You mention competitors of other models in your other reviews. Don't be afraid of that ex-DJ who loves his Escape :P.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You kids nowadays can't appreciate style can you? I was pretty straightforward with the rest of the review, not mentioning the Forester XT was done out of style rather anything else.

      Anyone can say "good" or "crap" but then again it won't appear as a review, won't it?

      Delete
    2. And who's that ex-DJ you're talking about?

      Delete
    3. I think its james deakin he's talking about

      Delete
  13. "Items in the cargo hold fair much better than the passengers "

    *should have been FARE.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I own a '13 Escape SEL (not in PH by the obvious), and I pretty much agree to most of Mr. Ang's analysis. What stands out for me with the Escape is its stability which is rock solid especially on long drives. With the judgement for the MFT, I find it subjective to driver preference. Mine had some bugs in the beginning, but after a sw update from the dealer last year, everything seemed to be fine. You can control the climate, entertainment, hands-free and navigation with it. I prefer to tinker over the screen, so not wear down the redundant manual buttons.
    While it is true that you have to go thru a maze of options in the menu to at least change the time, it's just like you changing a ringtone in your iphone or android. But mind you, for voice activated commands, you have to be "slang". The typical pinoy accent would not work.
    Then again, every car's beauty and nightmare is subjective. I have no regret with the Escape. Except now I am looking an Explorer since my 6 month old boy is dominating the cargo bays.

    ReplyDelete